Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu

The Role of the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG)

Minutes|Bretton Woods Project|11 October 2012|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

Sponsor:  Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) / World Bank Group

This session provided CSOs with the opportunity to have an exchange with IEG's Director-General and Senior Vice President on the role of the IEG.

Panelists: Caroline Heider(Director-General and Senior Vice President IEG), Chad Dobson (Executive Director Bank Information Center), John Garrison (Senior Civil Society Specialist, WB).

Facilitator: Vivian Jackson (Communications Officer, IEG)


Caroline Heider, head of the IEG

  • We guard our independence and impartiality very carefully
  • We try to hold the Bank accountable to its goals, make sure it hits its targets
  • We are not an advocacy group – need to stay objective and impartial
  • We try to collect info from CSOs/community groups during our evaluations
  • We are also trying to help national/regional evaluation bodies

Chad Dobson, BIC

  • We are an NGO set up to get out information about the Bank out to the public since 1989
  • 5is part of the Bank – different accountability mechansims (at IDA, IEG, CAO, IP, INT) – very important part of the WB, and sign of WB maturity as an organisation
  • IEG is the pre-eminent evaluation institution in the world; but people don’t know about it enough and its outputs are not used enough; especially communities don’t get into back from the IEG
  • Bank has an Open Data initiative which is great; so lets get IEG work more public as well
  • Concerns on the 5is: independence of the IEG in the system is key but must maintain their access to Bank internal information; appointment process of new DG of IEG was problematic; ownership of IEG recommendations needs to be strengthened – especially action plan follow-up; need to keep IEG budget up; need more IEG-CSO engagement in Washington (maybe it needs an advisory or consultative group)

John Garrison, World Bank

  • Division between IEG and staff is important, but staff do admire the IEG
  • Maybe IEG should do research into CSO involvement
  • IEG gets rated well by NGOs and shows best practice
  • IEG reports should be better used


Peter Chowla – can the IEG disclose project level data? Can you do more higher-level reviews that look at the policies?

Sas Thalankia – there is a time lag in IEG review which makes it hard to use the information and recommendation

Robert Namosey – committed staff can leak information, hints to follow – this is helpful; holding WB accountable for policy commitments is a key thing – Voices of the Poor for example – can you do more of this to make sure WB follows through on commitments?

Carline Heider

  • We have on our agenda the poverty reduction results – but haven’t looked at Voices of the Poor initiatives as such; we will think about that.
  • Thematic evaluations do raise the bar on the questions we ask to hit policy questions; we have the possibility to look at this; we do have it on our agenda
  • On time lag – we need to engage management on issues of what needs to improve, ease of this it depends on the evaluation
  • We have posted project ratings on the website – completion reports; but we are not yet to get every piece of information on the website – we are moving in this direction
  • Agree independence should not be isolation, and that appointment process needs to improve
  • Action plan – management action record requires them to give plans  to react to recommendations; 4 year long process with a once a year process to check on implementation
  • We want to do an effectiveness of our evaluations assessment
  • Maybe we need to get more engaged with existing consultative groups at the Bank
  • We are trying to do more synthesis

Vince McElihenny – value of the matrix management evaluation, this has good findings; incentive structure comments are very helpful; it would be better if IEG can expand its remit to do more like this; maybe the WB needs an evaluation policy to clarify its mandate.

Zach Hurwitz – national/regional level MDBs/RDBs/national DBs need things like IEG; how can WB help get this into country system approaches?

Duncan Pruett – who decides evaluation agenda? What happened to the evaluation of land administration programmes?

Caroline Heider

  • Don’t know the reaction when matrix evaluation was getting put on the agenda; we have to be committed to fighting those battles
  • DG evaluation mandate is defined – has strange words, but lets us look at anything that affects the WB development effectiveness; EDs didn’t see an urgent need for a policy
  • PREM/DEC are promoting evaluation capacity nationally; we support them, but need to create a culture of evaluation
  • Work programme has a big process, looking at 2015 so now having poverty reduction on the agenda, we are checking our product mix now as well; land administration is not an active part of our work programme; we are trying to fit things into the work cycle of the Bank.



Published: 11 October 2012 , last edited: 16 September 2013

Viewings since posted: 1488

Articles: 3465

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

New website launched

You are now browsing an archive version of the Bretton Woods Project's website. This site has not been updated since September 2013, but may be used for reference material as the nbew site is being developed. However we suggest you look at the new website:

Recent briefings & reports

Memorandum to the International Development Committee: Inquiry on the Future of UK Development Cooperation  26 June 2013

The Doing Business review: a test of World Bank leadership 24 June 2013

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

No item found

Latest IFI-related video

The World Bank and human rights abuse in Honduras 7 August, Social Justice Committee of Montreal


Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook

home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact

validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits