Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu

Social accountability compromised?

News|Bretton Woods Project|9 April 2013|update 85|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

The World Bank’s controversial Global Partnership for Social Accountability (GPSA, see Update 84), a new mechanism for the Bank to provide financing directly to civil society organisations (CSOs), opened its first call for proposals from mid February to mid March. Decisions on grants from the GPSA, which some critics have worried may be used to buy off opposition to Bank-funded projects, will be made by a nine-person GPSA steering committee, equally composed of donors, developing country governments, and CSO representatives.

Fifteen nominations for the CSO chairs were collected from the World Bank Institute-funded Affiliated Networks for Social Accountability (ANSA) of Africa, Asia and the Middle East as well as networks in Europe, Japan, Australia and North America. The final three were selected by "a multi-stakeholder group of persons from the Bank, donor agencies (US Agency for International Development, Canadian International Development Agency), and CSOs (Instituto de Comunicacion y Desarrollo, International Center for Not-for-Profit Law)". Of the two CSO representatives selected from developing countries, one is from TrustAfrica, a grant making organisation endowed by the Ford Foundation, one of the steering committee's donor chair holders, while the other is from ANSA-Arab World, a branch of ANSA.

The first call for proposals only accepted submissions from the 14 countries that have 'opted-in' to the GPSA, including countries facing accusations of human rights abuses, such as Belarus, Tajikistan and Honduras (see Update 85). More than 200 proposals were submitted in the first round, including over 100 from Malawi and Bangladesh, two of the three developing countries represented on the steering group. Once assessment of the submissions is finished, the GPSA will "make selected proposals available to governments for a 10-day vetting period."

Published: 9 April 2013 , last edited: 16 September 2013

Viewings since posted: 1333

Articles: 3465

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

New website launched

You are now browsing an archive version of the Bretton Woods Project's website. This site has not been updated since September 2013, but may be used for reference material as the nbew site is being developed. However we suggest you look at the new website:

Recent briefings & reports

Memorandum to the International Development Committee: Inquiry on the Future of UK Development Cooperation  26 June 2013

The Doing Business review: a test of World Bank leadership 24 June 2013

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

No item found


Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook

home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact

validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits