Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu

Finally resolving debt resolution?

News|Bretton Woods Project|26 June 2013|update 86|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

A March IMF policy paper examined long-standing approaches to debt crisis management (see Update 33, 28) including for the first time assessing the civil society proposals for a fair and transparent arbitration process. The study also looked at bail-in procedures to impose losses on private and official lenders (including as a prerequisite of further IMF lending), measures against vulture funds and a revamped Sovereign Debt Resolution Mechanism in light of the specific experiences of Jamaica, Grenada and the Dominican Republic, countries which have repeatedly returned to the IMF for additional lending over several decades. It also proposed mechanisms to overcome the challenge of ‘holdout’ creditors blocking restructurings, which happened in the case of Argentina (see Update 79).

The study was narrowly framed as how to best restore countries’ debt sustainability. It acknowledged that “debt restructurings have been too little and too late” and that IMF money has been used “to simply bail out private creditors”, but Tim Jones of UK NGO Jubilee Debt Campaign pointed out that the study “ignored all the social impacts of debt crises”. Bodo Elmers of European NGO network Eurodad argued that the IMF fails to analyse how “debt restructuring can make a more effective contribution to … development goals, poverty eradication and human rights. However, this goes beyond the IMF’s role and mandate. It is an issue for the UN to solve”.

In April, the IMF released a policy paper as part of its review into its existing debt limits policy, which sets the restrictions on how much and what kind of debt countries can contract under an IMF-supported programme. The policy was last modified in 2009. The Fund’s executive board requested that specific reform proposals be formulated, and that consultations take place with government authorities, lenders, other multilateral institutions, and civil society organisations on the design of the operational reforms.

Published: 26 June 2013 , last edited: 16 September 2013

Viewings since posted: 867

Articles: 3465

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

New website launched

You are now browsing an archive version of the Bretton Woods Project's website. This site has not been updated since September 2013, but may be used for reference material as the nbew site is being developed. However we suggest you look at the new website:

Recent briefings & reports

Memorandum to the International Development Committee: Inquiry on the Future of UK Development Cooperation  26 June 2013

The Doing Business review: a test of World Bank leadership 24 June 2013

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

No item found

Latest IFI-related video

The World Bank and human rights abuse in Honduras 7 August, Social Justice Committee of Montreal


Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook

home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact

validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits